Showing posts with label New Jersey Network. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Jersey Network. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Goodbye To the New Jersey Network

It's over.
New Jersey Network, the New Jersey state public television station, an institution that survived its puny UHF signals, a lack of local programming, News 12 New Jersey, and former Governor Christine Todd Whitman, signs off tomorrow. The state Senate failed to stop the takeover by New York City's main public television station, which is supported by Governor Chris Christie and shepherded by broadcaster Steve Adubato, ending a 40-year run.
What Christie is doing is shifting control of NJN - now to be called NJTV - to WNET in New York City, which also took over Long Island public television WLIW and phased out its own local public affairs programming, citing costs. But then, at least Long Island is a part of New York State. This move by the governor transfers a state property out of its borders, with only Adubato having any clue to what goes on in the Garden State. And WNET has no clue of local news coverage. They have no equivalent newscast covering New York State, or even the the city and its Westchester and Long Island suburbs, or news in Albany. NJN News covers all of New Jersey - especially what goes on in Trenton.
The state is to pay $4.7 million a year, including a grant from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, toward the deal, even though Montclair State University offered to take over NJN for less money and pointed to its state-of-the-art television studios and an offer to maintain NJN's antennas (not a part of the WNET deal). WNET's Neal Shapiro promised New Jersey programming at less cost, but New Jersey state taxpayers would still foot the same tax bill. Shapiro wants to save his station's money, not ours; his programming would use the barest facilities and resources.
State Senator Loretta Weinberg, a Bergen County Democrat, wasn't having any of this. "New Jersey’s taxpayers will be on the hook for millions of dollars annually to support the continued operation," Weinberg said. "So while we hand this network off to a New York operator, we are not saving that much money."
To be fair, a good deal of NJN's programming was the standard PBS fare of "Great Performances" and "Nature" and imported series from Britain. But NJN did have its distinguished newscast and its community affairs shows, as well as locally produced series devoted to the arts and the like. NJTV's fare promises to be more New York City-based programming with a New Jersey bent, and the nightly news report under consideration, as noted in my earlier post, would involve more analysis and less actual reporting. That's where Shapiro's savings come in. And less reporting means less actual news.
"What’s in it for the viewer?" asks the Star-Ledger's Paul Mulshine. "Nothing I can think of. As to what’s in it for the WNET bureaucracy, well, there’s money. And there’s also elimination of competition. Thanks to federal 'must-carry' provisions, if Montclair State got the station, the signal would compete with WNET on New York cable."
Montclair State University (from which one of NJN's UHF outlets broadcast) is going ahead with plans to compete with NJTV, but its broadcasting will be Internet-based. Not exactly the same thing.
As those of you who found this post via Facebook know, I've done some freelance reporting in northern New Jersey (and I won't say any more about that here, because this is a commentary blog, not a blog for news, and I like to keep the roles of reporting and commenting as separate as possible), so I have the utmost respect for NJN's reporters. I've even had the privilege of meeting a few of them, and I don't think I could ever do or say enough to convey my respect and admiration for them.
I met three. Many years ago, I met NJN reporter Belinda Morton - then one of the very few black female TV news reporters in the New York City area - and I acted like I'd met a Hollywood starlet, I was such a fan of her work. (Ms. Morton is long gone, as are so many other NJN reporters from the early nineties; many of them, I've been led to understand, are in public relations now.) More recently, I met current NJN reporter Desirée Taylor at an event I attended and I expressed regret over the NJN deal Christie inked; she thanked me for my concern. But the biggest NJN personality I ever met was Michael Aron, the station's long-time senior political correspondent, whose book on the 1993 New Jersey gubernatorial election I had read. Meeting him was like meeting Walter Cronkite or Eric Sevareid. Telling him how much I liked that book, I, having met him in May of this year (2011), admitted that many of the key players he covered in his book - Whitman, incumbent governor James Florio, et al. - were irrelevant now. "Well," he said with a smile, "I'm still around!"
What a difference a month makes. :-( Although Mr. Aron is a skilled moderator as well as a reporter, it remains to be seen if he will be on the new NJTV network. Doubtful, though. And would he want any job that keeps him in a studio in Manhattan or Trenton without doing any actual reporting? Because reporting in any of NJTV's proposed shows doesn't look like a realistic venture.
This is the kind of talent the state is divorcing itself from. More glaringly, Christie is saying good riddance to a devoted bunch of broadcasters who have always tried to put the state's best interests forward.
Unlike Chris Christie.

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Sign Off

New Jersey's governor, noted reckless driver Chris Christie, is planning to divest the state of its public television network, the New Jersey Network (NJN) and hand control of it over to WNET-TV, New York City's premier public television station. New Jersey is giving it away, while WNET will make $4,000,000 from the deal - half in the form of a grant transferred from the New Jersey Network and another half in broadcast tower rental fees NJN receives from private companies. So, Christie says New Jersey will save money by getting rid of a public television asset he says the state can no longer afford (and he says doesn't need!), but he's letting WNET have it for free.
NJN's 130 staffers could be affected, perhaps laid off due to inevitable redundancies. The state Assembly is holding hearings to examine the deal, with state Senate hearings to follow. The legislature has until June 28 to veto it. New Jersey also plans to sell its nine public radio stations for $1.9 million in cash and $2.4 million in non-cash contributions.
WNET president Neal Shapiro promises an improvement in New Jersey-oriented programming. He plans to have noted New Jersey broadcaster Steve Adubato produce a whole range of new public affairs programming, and he wants to start a nightly news program modeled more after the PBS NewsHour than the current NJN news program's anchoring and reporting format resembling local commercial newscasts. Many observers are skeptical, as they should be. I don't believe Shapiro lives in New Jersey. What does he know about the state, anyway?
By the way, WNET has done this before. The station took over Long Island public television station WLIW-TV and promised a continuation of Long Island public affairs programming, but all of that disappeared. Though anyone who ever saw "Face-Off," a "Crossfire"-style program in which Guylanders yelled and screamed at each other, will know that wasn't all a bad thing.
NJN has always been serious when it comes to presenting public affairs programming. Their schedule includes a program on the arts in New Jersey, programs about the affairs of the state's black and Hispanic populations, and panel discussions on politics in Trenton. Christie says he'd be more comfortable having NJN - to be called NJTV under the new deal with WNET - run by an entity not connected to the state when the network is suppose to cover him and other New Jersey politicians and be unbiased. But just how interested is an entity not connected to New Jersey going to be in covering the state's affairs?
Unlike national public television, NJN is a real network. Its four channels show the same programming simultaneously, it airs standard PBS fare in prime time (a state network can't really produce its own entertainment programming), and its primary concern is the public it serves. The network's employees, including the news staff, are top rate. I had the privilege of meeting two NJN personalities recently. I met NJN political correspondent Michael Aron at an art show reception and I had a detailed conversation with him about the state of the news media. And, just the other day, I also met reporter Desirée Taylor at a library grand re-opening I attended that she covered. Both of them couldn't have been any nicer. I gave both of them my cards. They're a really classy group of people. These are the type of people you want to see cover your state.
Until everything shakes out, though, the only certainty is that the state's News 12 commercial cable station will continue to cover local affairs - even if the stories they cover can be rather silly. The local newscasts from the New York and Philadelphia commercial stations can only be guaranteed to cover this state if there's a mob hit or a political scandal in Trenton or Newark.
Many Democratic lawmakers in Trenton, as well as U.S. Senator Frank Lautenberg, are critical of the governor's plans and hope to at best delay the implementation of the deal with WNET. There's also a report of an offer by Montclair State University to take over NJN that was rebuffed. Something fishy there.
In any case, this isn't the first time a Republican politician has tried to destroy public broadcasting. Newt Gingrich and John Boehner have both led efforts from the speakership of the U.S. House of Representatives to defund it. As mayor of New York City, Rudolph Giuliani sold WNYC-TV, a municipal TV station predating the 1967 federal public broadcasting law, to private interests, ending a tradition of providing foreign-language programming for the city's immigrant populations. And New Jersey's previous elected Republican governor, Christine Todd Whitman, cut funding to NJN while comparing government support for public media to Pravda. (A more apt comparative entity, the BBC, was never mentioned in that debate.) NJN had begun airing a hour-long nightly news report in April 1993; Whitman was elected governor that November, and the one-hour newscast experiment was short-lived, ending with the start of a new fiscal year in July 1994.
I'm crossing my fingers and hoping this will all work out. But I've seen this TV show before. :-(