The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), which would fundamentally alter the Internet and the way it is used, has been shelved from consideration by the U.S. House of Representatives. This is good news, but SOPA's sister bill, the Protect Intellectual Property Act (PIPA), is up for a vote in the U.S. Senate next Tuesday. Many of the provisions in that bill are similar to SOPA, which is adamantly opposed in the House by Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA), and Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) has threatened to filibuster PIPA if it comes up on January 24 as scheduled.
The provisions of PIPA include the right of Internet service providers to voluntarily block sites suspected of even the mildest copyright infringement and punitive action against sites that give Internet users information on how to access blocked sites. Any site can be blocked or shut down by the federal government at whim if it is suspected of copyright infringement of any sort. Essentially, it (like SOPA) advocates Internet censorship. Also, SOPA as written would allow domain name servers to be filtered or blocked, which computer experts say could weaken the global Internet, as the provision would have a long, global reach against all Web sites irrespective of country of origin.
With progressives and Tea Partiers alike opposing these bills (and with Wikipedia's English-language pages going black for tomorrow in protest), the prospects for their eventual defeat are fairly bright. They just got brighter, in fact, with a statement from White House, which said that it could not support "legislation that reduces freedom of expression, increases cybersecurity risk, or undermines the dynamic, innovative global Internet." President Obama, however, hasn't flatly ruled out signing whatever bill comes to his desk.
I myself could be affected by this legislation. If YouTube is shut down for having too many videos infringing on copyrights, I won't be able to continue my Music Video Of the Week feature on my blog. This blog itself could easily shut down by using quotes from other sources, credited or not. And since I use photos on my beautiful women picture blog that are not my own (like I can really use a picture of Reese Witherspoon that I took myself) and come from a variety of sources, every goshdarn picture could be deemed an illegal copyright infringement.
I have a special post on this subject planned for tomorrow. Tune in then to see what is.
No comments:
Post a Comment