Ooh . . . kay . . ..
The House of Representatives has just passed a bill that would prohibit - ready for this? - hair discrimination. This bill would specifically prevent employers from discriminating against job applicants because of hair that is braided, dreadlocked, cornrowed, or of a non-natural color like purple, yellow or green, some of which are the occasional colors of braids, dreadlocks and cornrows.
The traditionally black hairstyles I just mentioned look unprofessional and way too casual, and that's not the sort of look many offices and retailers would tolerate from their employees. Dressing for success means having appropriate hair as well as having appropriate clothes.
Lest you think this perspective has a racist subtext, I need only point out how many white males were also discriminated back in the Vietnam era against because they grew their hair too long and sometimes grew beards because they wanted to look like the Beatles - not the moptop Beatles who played on "The Ed Sullivan Show" in 1964, the hippie Beatles who posed at Tittenhurst Park in 1969. Guys who grew their hair that long didn't want to get an office or retail job; that was capitalism, dude, you know, working for . . . "the man." Even if they had tried to get a job like that, they wouldn't have gotten a job with absurdly long hair. As the Five Man Electrical Band sang . . .
If you want to wear a loud, uncouth hairstyle to tick off the establishment, that's fine by me. Just don't expect to keep that look if you want to join the establishment.
Unless you're Ketanji Brown Jackson, who did not take my advice about losing her braids but will likely be confirmed to the Supreme Court anyway.
Oh, yeah, I have a black female friend who always wore her dark hair straight, and she always looked beautiful. She just got long yellow (not blonde, yellow) cornrows. I don't have the heart to tell her that I think she looks terrible.
No comments:
Post a Comment