Showing posts with label dysfunction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dysfunction. Show all posts

Thursday, January 23, 2025

Anarchy In the U.S.A.?

Donald Trump has already done considerable damage to the United States, and he's just getting started.  If you think his executive orders and his January 6 pardons are terrible, you're in for worse to come.

Right now, things look bleak enough.  Trumpism is dominant, MAGA is on the march, and there's less resistance than acceptance.  The Democrats, having expected to be in a period of triumph at this time for electing the first black female President, are too traumatized to object to Trump.  None of them have stepped forward to rally the party and, by association, anti-Trump Americans.  It seems that for every executive order that lawsuits have been filed against, there are at least two executive orders that are perfectly legal (like any executive order pulling the United States out of international agreements, for example).  There is more to come.  This is not going to end well.

However, I don't think this will end on January 20, 2029.  I don't even think it will only end later than that.  I think it will end sooner.

Trump is still threatening to take actions in foreign affairs that are sure to rile up other countries and isolate the U.S. from the rest of the world - more than it already is now.  He's likely to rattle his saber against Panama for control of the Panama Canal, and his historically based claims to the canal have disturbing parallels to Adolf Hitler's claim to the Free City of Danzig and the Polish Corridor in 1939, which led to the German invasion of Poland that began World War II.  An American invasion of Panama wouldn't necessarily began a global war, but it would cause severe economic dislocation in the world and might cause especially severe shortages and hyperinflation based on the scarcity of goods - both from the disruption caused in Panama and economic sanctions against the United States by the European Union and China.  Black markets would form.   Chaos would ensue.  State and local governments would have to  deal with civil unrest on a regular basis.   

We might not even need an illegal occupation of Panama for all that.  How about Trump's threatened deportations of Hispanic migrants, which would rattle the domestic economy because of all of the work migrants do to keep the flow of goods and services moving?  The actor Luis Avalos once called Hispanics the "dynamo" of American life; this is what he meant.  A forced removal of migrant workers would cause a breakdown of the country's economic system, and that would have the same effect as an international crisis in Panama.  

And what about Trump's withdrawal from the World Health Organization, which I talked about yesterday?  He likely gave, inadvertently, more control of the organization to China, which will inevitably further corrupt an already compromised international body.  All we need is another pandemic - not even a so-called "once in a century" pandemic like COVID, just a pandemic that causes enough instability and paranoia - or even an epidemic, and chaos results.

Any of these scenarios - and scenarios I haven't even pondered yet -  could lead to dysfunction of the federal government and encourage Trump to try to "dominate the streets" - not just in Washington but in other cities.  The entire system could collapse or could fall progressively in a domino effect.  It all leads to one thing - anarchy.

A breakdown of the system will inevitably lead to violence and destruction.  We don't need invading armies to lay waste to the homeland the way the Union did to the Confederacy in 1865 or the way the Allies did to Nazi Germany in 1945.  We're capable of rendering Washington by ourselves to the same fate as Richmond after the fall of the Confederate government or Berlin after the Red Army subdued it.  And Trump will likely stay in the White House - the physical building, I mean - but while he may not flee like Jefferson Davis or commit suicide like Adolf Hitler, he will definitely be deposed.  He could be taken captive by ordinary citizens who scale the fences of the White House and storm the mansion itself.  If that sounds unthinkable, remember that January 6 was unthinkable.  So was the idea that militant "students" in another country could scale the fence of our embassy there and storm the building and take its inhabitants hostage for a year and change - with their government's support. 

The United States, being a continent-sized nation of nation-sized states, won't feel the affects of such anarchy equally.  Some areas of the country will fare better than others, though it would be an uneducated guess as to which states would come out more favorably.  But once Trump is gone under such circumstances - circumstances of his own doing - the United States will be a wounded nation, a country that will need to be rebuilt physically and socially.  And I don't think the rest of the world will have much sympathy for us, so there won't be a Marshall Plan for us.  We'll be on our own.  

If we still have a country by then.  We could end up being a dozen separate countries, because even though mass merchandising and a nationalized consumer economy have rendered every place in America the same - "you make a right at Home Depot, pass two lights and make a left at Wal-Mart, pass McDonald's, and then you turn right into the parking lot of the mall where the Macy's wing is" - regional differences based on culture and politics still reign supreme.  An ugly highway of strip stores and shopping malls in Illinois may look no different than an ugly highway of strip stores and shopping malls in Texas, but the values of the people in each of those states are quite different indeed.   I even made a map of how I think the United States might split up.  (Click on the map to get a better look at it.)

Don't assume that this can't happen.  Back in 1978, when Pope John Paul II assumed the throne of Peter and began his crusade against communism in Eastern Europe, everyone agreed that the idea of the Soviet Union splitting up into fifteen separate countries was preposterous.

Thursday, February 25, 2010

No 2020 Vision

I can't believe I missed this story when it broke over the past weekend. It wasn't in my local Sunday paper, nor was it mentioned on the television news broadcast I always watch. If Bob Costas reported it, I must have missed it. But here's the latest in the continuing story of the United States Olympic Committee against the International Olympic Committee. . . . No American city will bid for the 2020 Olympics.
The USOC explained that, what with Chicago having spent $80 million for an unsuccessful bid for the 2016 Games that IOC animosity toward its American counterpart doomed from the start, it would be fruitless for any American city to bid for 2020. USOC Chairman Larry Probst said the IOC made it clear; as long as the USOC is unable to get its act together (leadership keeps changing at the top) or compromise with the IOC on revenue sharing, the United States is not going to get the Olympics again.
The USOC doesn't even want to discuss 2024.
It might be tempting to write off the USOC's move as sour grapes - taking all of its marbles out of the game and walking away. But Probst - who may be replaced as USOC chairman by the time you read this - is trying to make amends. He has been in Vancouver during the Winter Olympics and has spent more time talking with Olympic officials from other nations and 32 IOC members. He's been asking how the USOC can do better and respond to IOC concerns. It's going to be an ongoing process, as the disputes between the American and international committees will take more than a couple of cocktail parties in Vancouver to resolve.
In the meantime, American winter athletes have been taking more responsibility for their own appearances at and preparations before the Games, with the USOC growing more dysfunctional by the day and corporate sponsorship drying up due to the recession. (Stephen Colbert is only one man, supporting one sport. He can't do it alone.) It's why Americans have been winning more medals in Vancouver than anyone else - they've taught themselves the maturity and responsibility the USOC can't teach them. The children have become the parent, and vice versa. Probst has spent more time negotiating with Olympic officials in Vancouver than attending the actual events. Maybe he feels he shouldn't take the credit for the success of his country's athletes.
I'm glad we Americans won't get the Olympics for awhile. Let the USOC fix itself first, if that's even possible. Besides, if American cities had been able to bid for 2020, one of them would have likely been Tulsa.
Tulsa?
(My sympathies to Lindsey Vonn and Julia Mancuso for their giant slalom mishaps, especially to Vonn for her injury.)